GBC Agent Spineless Jelly

GBC Agent Spineless Jelly

Introduction

I start writing GBC members about ex escort agency manager who is supporting fashion shows and disco dance in ISKCON. This GBC member said he was writing to “me personally” and that “I should not circulate it” so I will have to hide his identity. Spineless jellies never have public stance on any issue.

My first email

Message-ID: <CAHEdfkExk81FhCCfuTSEmXoh=mFmdyiT_HEX7zefKdJgJw6usw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 12:12:41 +0000
Subject: GBC resolution sponsorship
From: Hanuman das
To: [NAME HIDDEN]

Dear X,

please accept my humble obeisances.

All glories to Srila Prabhupada.

I would like to propose GBC resolution, however I believe I can’t do it directly, rather I have to find GBC body member who will “sponsor” it. Would you like to sponsor my resolution?

My resolution aims to prevent situation which harmful for ISKCON and it’s members.

When someone joins ISKCON, he automatically becomes follower of GBC body, which is highest managerial authority as desired by Prabhupada. GBC body should therefore consist of most elevated personalities who have spotless biography. Of course, this is not the case if we look at biography of Malati “prabhu”.

I am personally obliged to follow GBC body members as my authorities if I want to be member of ISKCON, but I don’t want to follow ex escort agency manager, Malati “prabhu”.

Therefore, I propose following resolution. I took resolution 313 / 2016 as template, I hope that is ok:

RESOLUTION: “The idea that ex escort agency manager can be member of GBC body is solely opinion of GBC body and do not necessarily reflect the views and practices of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON), or its Founder-Acarya, His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada.

EXPLANATION: Our topmost duty as ISKCON members is to protect dignity of ISKCON and we are not doing that by putting ex escort agency managers in the top managerial body.

Even in karmi society, you can’t enter top managerial position on UN, NATO or any major organisation for that matter if you don’t have spotless biography. We could see this practically in recent selection of Trump’s advisers.

If we want that general society takes us seriously, we can’t have ex escort agency managers in our top management body. That is common sense.

For example, NATO general David Petraeus stepped down from his position after his extramarital affair was discovered. I very much doubt that he would even become general if he was managing escort agency before joining the army.


So, to protect dignity of Srila Prabhupada’s movement, I am looking for sponsor for this resolution, and also I am eager to seek out GBC members who actually wouldn’t like to support this resolution, who would like to prolong this disgrace of having ex escort agency manager in our top body.

All my emails are public, I hope that is ok, and all responses to my emails are also public. If I don’t get reply, I assume that you support ex escort agency managers in GBC body.

I prefer to publish both my letter and reply in same article, so I will wait 48 hours to publish this email. If you need more time, let me know.

Hoping to make this glorious movement great again,
Hanuman das

Agent Spineless Jelly response

Received: by mail.pamho.net (COM 3.89.6); Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:50:25 +0100
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:09 +0530
From: [NAME HIDDEN]
To: "Hanuman (das) SDHS (Zagreb - HR)" <Hanuman.SDHS@pamho.net>
Subject: RE: GBC resolution sponsorship
X-Mailer: COM 3.89.6

I apologize but I have my desk piled with projects I have already promised
to complete. Sponsoring a resolution is not just putting one’s name on it.
It involves making sure that it is put in cue for consideration, explaining
it to the chair of the deputies, getting in refinements done that the
deputy chair may ask for, presenting it to the deputies, explaining it and
arguing the case before the GBC. The list goes on but you get the idea. I
simply cannot add one more thing to my “To Do” list.

Additionally, the GBC is not going to pass a resolution aimed at one member
i.e. Malati mataji. Resolutions need to address a wide-spread principle. In
its consideration, they must have considered her past a thing of the past
and her devotional qualities of sufficient merit to warrant her being
appointed a GBC member. After all, ISKCON law allows one to become an
initiating guru after ten years with no falldown.

I was not there the year Malati dd was appointed. I believe that Varnashram
dharma and Srila Prabhupada’s expression of it intended Vaisnavis and
Vaisnavas to have different roles in society–each of equal importance but
not the same duties / roles. This issue, the proper role of Vaisnavis in
ISKCON is a major and on-going discussion of the GBC.

The bottom line is that I don’t think this resolution as drafted is going to
succeed. Additionally, I don’t have the inclination nor free mental
bandwidth or time to push it forward. I am sorry to report this as I know
this is not the reply you hoped to receive. Please do not write me back
about this. Additionally, if you circulate this personal note to you, if you
get all worked up and make my reply your latest campaign, I will add you to
my “block sender” list and you will never be able to reach me again.

Your servant,
X

My second email

Message-ID: <CAHEdfkGYdH5UjHNssZnDZYN=cnA=T1dqQ+=5Q4ELXkKk8vYuiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 21:44:55 +0000
Subject: Re: GBC resolution sponsorship
From: Hanuman das
To: [NAME HIDDEN]

Dear X,

please accept my humble obeisances.

All glories to Srila Prabhupada.

I apologize but I have my desk piled with projects I have already promised to complete. Sponsoring a resolution is not just putting one’s name on it. It involves making sure that it is put in cue for consideration, explaining it to the chair of the deputies, getting in refinements done that the deputy chair may ask for, presenting it to the deputies, explaining it and arguing the case before the GBC. The list goes on but you get the idea. I simply cannot add one more thing to my “To Do” list.

Ok, if your pile of projects ever decreases, maybe you can look into cat and dog society that USA ISKCON converted itself into. This should be project of major importance. Actually, I can’t think of any other project more important for you as GBC than to prevent your dependants from falling to the cat and dog level.

I am talking about half naked kuli cat fashion show and kuli dog disco club, which took place on New Vrindavan last year. If you don’t believe me, you can check my newest documentary:

Women: kuli cats or chaste wives

Additionally, the GBC is not going to pass a resolution aimed at one member i.e. Malati mataji. Resolutions need to address a wide-spread principle. In its consideration, they must have considered her past a thing of the past and her devotional qualities of sufficient merit to warrant her being appointed a GBC member. After all, ISKCON law allows one to become an initiating guru after ten years with no falldown.

Really? That sounds cute. Except it is not true, resolution 313 / 2016 was aimed at one member.

yad yad acarati srestha, I hope young girls will not imitate her by leaving their husband, finding new lover, becoming escort agency managers and taking heroin. She is not setting good example. Karmi journalists will eat us alive if they ever put their hands on her biography.

I was not there the year Malati dd was appointed. I believe that Varnashram dharma and Srila Prabhupada’s expression of it intended Vaisnavis and Vaisnavas to have different roles in society–each of equal importance but not the same duties / roles. This issue, the proper role of Vaisnavis in ISKCON is a major and on-going discussion of the GBC.

[SENTENCE REMOVED AS PART OF WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM]

The bottom line is that I don’t think this resolution as drafted is going to succeed. Additionally, I don’t have the inclination nor free mental bandwidth or time to push it forward. I am sorry to report this as I know this is not the reply you hoped to receive. Please do not write me back about this. Additionally, if you circulate this personal note to you, if you get all worked up and make my reply your latest campaign, I will add you to my “block sender” list and you will never be able to reach me again.

I will not write you anymore about this. Please watch my documentary from above and ask yourself, “Didn’t we betray Prabhupada by allowing Kuli cat fashion shows and banning WMM book?”.

I will publish our exchange, because I believe we don’t have anything to hide. But since you sent it as personal note, I will remove your name so that you are not further entangled into this issue.

your servant,
Hanuman das

Agent Spineless Jelly goes tough

Received: by mail.pamho.net (COM 3.89.6); Wed, 08 Mar 2017 03:10:22 +0100
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:32 +0530
From: [NAME HIDDEN]
To: "Hanuman (das) SDHS (Zagreb - HR)" <Hanuman.SDHS@pamho.net>
Subject: RE: GBC resolution sponsorship
X-Mailer: COM 3.89.6

Congratulations. You have earned a place on my “Block Sender” list. Anything
you send me from now on will be deleted by my server before I even see it. I
warned you of this possibility but it seems that you are unable to hear good
advice. I am sorry to have to add you to this ignoble category but your
arrogant, two dimensional, and cruel spirit are too unpalatable for me.

Conclusion

So, fighting against fashion shows and disco dance on ISKCON premises is arrogant, two dimensional and cruel.

Did you see how he was not able to utter a single word against fashion shows and disco dance. What a loser. But he was tough with me because I write him email about fashion shows. These people are supposed to police Srila Prabhupada’s standards in ISKCON. Now, I am officially scared for ISKCON future.

Never again I will be able to write to Agent Spineless Jelly to help protect ISKCON against deviations. I am devastated.


Shares